; Francisco A. Gómez Jara, El movimiento campesino en Mé- ” Caudillismo y estado en la revolución mexicana: el gobierno de Alvarado en 6 See Alan Knight’s discussion of this subject in “lntellectuals in the Mexican Revolu-. Alan Knight, ‘La Revolución mexicana de François-Xavier Guerra: .. Díaz, Memoria campesina: la historia de Xalatlaco contada por su gente (Toluca, ) . Remembering Mexico’s Last Caudillo, Alvaro Obregón’, in Lyman L. Johnson (ed. Alan Knight, “Peasant and Caudillo in Revolutionary Mexico –17”; . en el México Revolucionario (Mexico City: Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores, ) . a Contradecir: Los Campesinos de Morelos y el Estado National (Mexico City: .

Author: Shaktibei Fenrirr
Country: Mayotte
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Finance
Published (Last): 5 June 2006
Pages: 244
PDF File Size: 2.21 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.60 Mb
ISBN: 141-1-99932-854-2
Downloads: 49055
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mooguhn

Emiliano Zapata Salazar Spanish pronunciation: Zapata early on participated in political movements against Diaz and the landowning hacendadosand when the Revolution broke out in he was positioned as a central leader of the peasant revolt in Morelos.

Cooperating with a number of other peasant leaders he formed the Liberation Army of the Southof caudiloos he soon became the undisputed leader. Madero became president he disavowed the role of the Zapatistas, denouncing them as simple bandits.

Emiliano Zapata

In NovemberZapata promulgated the Plan de Ayala which called for substantial land reforms, redistributing lands to the peasants. Madero sent the Federal Army to root out the Zapatistas in Morelos. Madero’s generals employed a scorched earth policy, burning villages and forcibly removing their inhabitants, and drafting many men into the Army or sending them to forced labour camps in southern Mexico. This strengthened Zapata’s standing among the peasants, and Zapata was able to drive the forces of Madero led by Caampesinos Huerta out of Morelos.

Caudillo and Peasant in the Mexican Revolution – Google Books

Zapata did not recognize the authority that Carranza asserted as leader of the revolutionary movement, continuing his adherence to the Plan de Ayala. In the aftermath of the revolutionaries’ victory over Huerta, they attempted to sort out power relations in the Convention of Aguascalientes.

Zapata and Villa broke with Carranza, and Mexico descended into civil war among the winners. Dismayed with the alliance with Villa, Zapata focused his energies on rebuilding society in Morelos which he now controlled, instituting the land reforms of the Plan de Ayala. As Carranza consolidated his power and defeated Villa inZapata initiated guerrilla warfare against the Carrancistas, who in turn invaded Morelos, employing once again scorched-earth tactics to oust the Zapatista rebels.

Zapata once again retook Morelos in and held most of the state against Carranza’s troops until he was killed in an ambush in April Article 27 of the Mexican Constitution was drafted in response to his agrarian demands. InZapatistas managed to obtain powerful posts in the governance of Morelos after Carranza’s fall.

They instituted many of the land reforms envisioned by Zapata in Morelos. Zapata remains an iconic figure in Mexico, used both as a nationalist symbol as well as a symbol of the neo-Zapatista movement.

Emiliano Zapata was born to Gabriel Zapata and Cleofas Jertrudiz Salazar of AnenecuilcoMorelosa well-known local family; Emiliano’s godfather was the manager of a large local haciendaand his godmother was the manager’s wife.

From a family of farmers, Emiliano Zapata had insight into the severe difficulties of the countryside and his village’s long struggle to regain land taken by expanding haciendas.

He received a limited education from his teacher, Emilio Vara, but it included “the rudiments of bookkeeping”. Emiliano was entrepreneurial, buying a team of mules to haul maize from farms to town, as well as bricks to the Hacienda of Chinameca; he was also a successful farmer, growing watermelons as a cash crop. He had a striking appearance, with a large mustache in which he took pride, and good quality clothing described by a comrade: Around the turn of the 20th century, Anenecuilco was a mixed Spanish-speaking mestizo and indigenous Nahuatl -speaking pueblo.

It had a long history of protesting the local haciendas taking community members’ land, and its leaders gathered colonial-era documentation of their land titles to prove their claims.

Many peasants were subsequently forced into debt peonage peonaje on the haciendas. These officials became enforcers of changes in land tenure that favored the concentration of land progressively into the hands of fewer and wealthier landowners. Zapata was one of many rebel leaders who were conscripted at some point.

He announced “my intention to resign from my position due to my old age and limited abilities to continue the fight for the land rights of the village. The elders on the council were so well respected by the village men that no one would dare to override their nominations or vote for an individual against the advice of the current council at that time.


Emiliano Zapata – Wikipedia

After the nominations were closed, a vote was taken and Zapata became the new council president without contest. Although Zapata had turned 30 only a month before, voters knew that it was necessary to elect someone respected by the community who would be responsible for the village.

Even though he was relatively young, Anenecuilco was ready to hand over the leadership to him without any worry of failure. Even though Zapata’s efforts failed, he was able to create and cultivate relationships with political authority figures that would prove useful for him.

Zapata became a leading figure in the village of Anenecuilco, where his family had lived for many generations, and he became involved in struggles for the rights of the campesinos of Morelos. He was able to oversee the redistribution of the land from some haciendas peacefully but had problems with others. He observed numerous conflicts between villagers and hacendadosor landowners, over the constant theft of village land, and in one instance, saw the hacendados torch an entire villa.

For many years, he campaigned steadfastly for the rights of the villagers, first establishing via ancient title deeds their claims to disputed land, and then pressing the recalcitrant governor of Morelos into action. Finally, disgusted with the slow response from the government and the overt bias towards the wealthy plantation owners, Zapata began making use of armed force, simply taking over the land in dispute.

The flawed elections were a major reason for the outbreak of the ,night Revolution in Zapata, seeing an opportunity to promote land reform in Mexico, [14] made quiet alliances with Madero, whom he perceived to be the best chance for genuine change in the country. He also fought the Mexican Revolution with Pancho Villa. These two people fought to help the peasants get their land back until they both got killed by the government.

At acudillos end of the Mexican revolution, the government passed down the Mexican Constitution which it basically gave the land back to the peasants, universal suffrage, supported public education, the minimum wage for Mexicans, and maximum hours restrictions.

Zapata joined Madero’s campaign against President Diaz. Under Madero, some new land reforms were carried out and elections were to be ensured. However, Zapata was dissatisfied with Madero’s stance on land reform, which Madero did not really believe in, [16] and was unable, despite repeated efforts, to make him understand the importance of the issue or to get him to act on it.

Madero was not ready to create a radical change in the manner that agrarian relations operated during this time. Some other individuals, [ who? The major method of agrarian relations had been that of communal lands, called ejidos. Although some [ who? Upon seeing the response by villagers, Madero offered formal justice in courts to individuals who had been wronged by others with regard to agrarian politics. Zapata decided that on the surface it seemed as though Madero was doing good things for the people of Mexico, but Zapata did not know the level of sincerity in Madero’s actions and thus did not know if he should support him completely.

Madero and Zapata’s relations worsened during the summer of as Madero appointed eb governor who supported plantation owners and refused to meet Zapata’s agrarian demands. Compromises between the two failed in Novemberdays after Madero was elected President. The plan declared Madero a traitor, [16] named Pascual Orozco head of the Acudillos, [16] and outlined a plan for true land reform. Zapata also declared the Maderistas as a counter-revolution and denounced Madero.

Orozco was from Chihuahuanear the U. In the following weeks, the development of military operations “betray ed good evidence of clear and intelligent planning. Zapata believed that the best route of attack would be to center the fighting and action in Cuautla. If this political location could be overthrown, the army would have enough power to “veto anyone else’s control of the state, negotiate for Cuernavaca or attack it directly, and maintain independent access to Mexico City as well as escape routes to the southern hills.

The first line of action demanded that Zapata and his men “control the area behind and below a line from Jojutla to Yecapixtla. As the opposition of the Federal Army and police detachments slowly dissipated, the army would be able to eventually gain powerful control over key locations on the Interoceanic Railway from Puebla City to Cuautla. If these feats could be completed, it would knnight access to Cuautla directly and the city would fall.


Campsinos plan of action was carried out successfully in Jojutla.

However, Pablo Torres Burgosthe commander of the operation, was disappointed that the army disobeyed his orders against looting and ransacking. The army took complete control of the area, and it seemed as though Torres Burgos had lost any type of control that he believed he had over his forces prior to this event. Shortly after, Torres Burgos called a meeting and resigned from his position.

Upon leaving Jojutla with his two sons, mexivo was surprised by a federal police patrol who subsequently shot all three of the men on the spot.

This seemed to be the fix to all of the problems that had just arisen, but other individuals wanted to replace Zapata as well. Due to this new conflict, the individual who would come out on top would have to do so by “convincing his peers he deserved their backing. Zapata finally did gain the support necessary by his peers and was considered a “singularly qualified candidate”.

In order to succeed, Zapata needed a strong financial backing for the battles to come. This came in the form of 10, pesos revolucionaroi by Rodolfo from the Tacubayans. After some time Zapata became the leader of his “strategic zone”.

Zapata immediately began to use his newly found power and began to overthrow city after city with gaining momentum. Madero, alarmed, asked Zapata to disarm and demobilize. Zapata responded that, if the people could not win their rights now, when they were revolucionafio, they would have no chance once they were unarmed and helpless. Madero sent several generals in an attempt to deal with Zapata, but wlan efforts had little success.

It seemed as though Zapata would shortly be able to overthrow Madero. Before he could overthrow Madero, [16] General Victoriano Huerta beat him to it in February[16] ordering Madero arrested and executed. Although this may have caused individuals to believe that the revolution was over, it was not. The battle continued for years to come over the fact that Mexican individuals did not have agrarian rights that were fair, nor did they have the protection necessary to fight against those who pushed such exploitation upon them.

On April 21,U. President Woodrow Wilson sent a contingent of troops to occupy the port city of Veracruz. This sudden threat caused Huerta to withdraw his troops from Morelos and Puebla, leaving only Jojutla and Cuernavaca under federal control. Zapatistas quickly assumed control of eastern Morelos, taking Cuautla and Jonacatepec with no resistance.

In spite of being faced with a possible foreign invasion, Zapata refused to csudillos with Huerta in defense of the nation. He stated that if need be he would defend Mexico alone as chief of the Ayalan forces. They also laid siege to Cuernavaca where a small contingent of federal troops were holed up. In caudillls of having contributed decisively to the fall of Huerta, the Zapatistas were left out of the peace treaties, probably because of Carranza’s intense dislike for the Zapatistas whom he saw as uncultured savages.

As the constitutionalist forces began to split, with Francisco “Pancho” Villa posing a popular front against Carranza’s constitutionalism, Carranza worked diplomatically to get the Zapatistas to recognize his rule.

Atl as an envoy to propose a compromise with Zapata. Zapata nonetheless refused to recognize Carranza’s leadership, stating that the only acceptable result was following the Plan de Ayalaervolucionario would make him supreme chief of an interim government. Finally, Zapata decided to side mexick Villa against Carranza and Obregon. Zapata and his envoys managed to get the convention to adopt some of the agrarian principles of devolucionario Plan de Ayala.

The meeting was awkward but amiable, and was widely publicized. It was decided that Zapata should work on securing the area east of Morelos from Puebla towards Veracruz. Nonetheless, during the ensuing campaign in Puebla, Zapata was disappointed by Villa’s lack of support.