Inalienable Possessionstests anthropology’s traditional assumptions about kinship, Annette B. Weiner . Afterword: The Challenge of Inalienable Possessions. : Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While Giving ( ): Annette B. Weiner: Books. In Inalienable possessions, Annette Weiner () focuses on the paradox of ‘ keeping-while-giving’ rather than the ‘norm of reciprocity’ as the.
|Published (Last):||4 May 2007|
|PDF File Size:||9.98 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.53 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
She currently serves as President of the American Anthropological Association. Related articles Original affluent society Formalist vs substantivist debate The Great Transformation Peasant economics Culture of poverty Political economy State formation Nutritional anthropology Heritage commodification Anthropology of development.
Annette Weiner broadened the application of the category of property outside the European context with her book Inalienable Possessions: Inalienable possessions or immovable property are things such as land or objects that are symbolically identified with the groups that own them and so cannot be permanently severed from them. He derived two theses from Weiner, to which he adds a third.
In these cases, women are critical to the “cosmological authentication” of inalienable possessions. Weiner argues that the role of wener in the exchange of inalienable possessions has been seriously underestimated.
Inalienable possessions – Wikipedia
Thus, when they are transferred from one individual or group to another the objects reserve meaningful bonds associated with that of the giver and their lineage.
Classical, Early, and Medieval Plays and Playwrights: Actor—network theory Alliance theory Cross-cultural studies Cultural materialism Culture theory Diffusionism Feminism Historical particularism Boasian anthropology Functionalism Interpretive Performance studies Political economy Practice theory Structuralism Post-structuralism Systems theory.
Only gifts that are “immoveable property” can become inalienable gifts. The book is also important for introducing a consideration of gender in the gift-giving debate by placing women at the heart of the political process. There, only chiefs were allowed to engage in Kula exchange. Original affluent society Formalist vs substantivist debate The Great Transformation Peasant economics Culture of poverty Political economy State formation Nutritional anthropology Heritage commodification Anthropology of development.
The development of Polynesian kingdoms is an example. Weiner No preview available – Selected pages Title Page. Kula exchange is the only way for an individual to achieve local prestige without local political action. Provisioning systems Hunting-gathering Pastoralism Nomadic pastoralism Shifting cultivation Moral economy Peasant economics.
In this way, The Dreaming itself encompasses vast inalienable possessions that are authenticated by the very cosmology under which they are produced. Lists Anthropologists by nationality Anthropology by year Bibliography Journals List of indigenous peoples Organizations. Australian inalienable possessions are given cosmological authentication through their religious beliefs in the Dreaming.
Hunting-gathering Pastoralism Nomadic pastoralism Shifting cultivation Moral economy Peasant economics. Social and cultural anthropology. The book focuses on a range of Oceanic societies from Polynesia to Papua New Guinea to test existing theories of reciprocity gift-giving and marriage exchange. Weiner shows that the focus on women as wives ignores the importance of women as sisters who are not “lost” as a result of becoming wives.
That ownership may be a bundle of rights held in common by groups of individuals or lineages. My library Help Advanced Book Search.
Weiner has used the term to categorize the many Kula valuables of the Trobriand islanders who view those objects as culturally imbued with a spiritual sense of the gift giver.
The Forgotten Dimension Source: Calling attention to their presence in Western history, Weiner points out that her formulations are not limited to Oceania.
Rather, these gifts can’t be re-sold for money by the receiver because the value and the significance of the gift cannot be alienated or disengaged from its relationship to those whose inalienable possession it is.
Inalienable Possessions tests anthropology’s traditional assumptions about kinship, economics, power, and gender in an exciting challenge to accepted theories of reciprocity and marriage exchange. Calling attention to possessionz presence in Western history, Weiner points out that her formulations are not limited to Oceania. Goods can serve as systems of social communication according to Mary Douglasa prominent anthropologist. She further argues that inalienable possessions gain the “mana” spirit of their possessors, and so become associated with them.
Reciprocity, she says, is only the superficial aspect of exchange, possessions overlays much more politically powerful strategies of “keeping-while-giving. Landed estates in the Middle Agesfor example, had to remain intact and even if sold, they could be reclaimed by blood possessiohs. Theuws argues that “Over time, objects acquire new meanings and what was once a humble pot may become a sacred vessel.
Inalienable Possessions: The Forgotten Dimension
Anthropologists by nationality Anthropology by year Bibliography Journals List of indigenous peoples Organizations. Common terms and phrases A.
Key theories Actor—network theory Unalienable theory Cross-cultural studies Cultural materialism Culture theory Diffusionism Feminism Historical particularism Boasian anthropology Functionalism Interpretive Performance studies Political economy Practice theory Structuralism Post-structuralism Systems theory.
David Ricardo Murray N.
Inalienable possessions are nonetheless frequently drawn into exchange networks. University of California Pr Amazon.
However, these possessions may also become destabilizing, as elites reconstruct those sacred histories to identify themselves with the past; for example, Gandhi invoked the traditional hand spinning traditional cloth, khadi, to contest British rule, which Nehru referred to as Gandhi’s “livery of freedom”. A critical part of Weiner’s argument is that the ability to keep inalienable possessions outside of exchange is a source of difference, and hence brings high status.
Women as sisters and women as wives provide the conduit for the gifting and return gifting of these goods, allowing the givers to build prestige. Other inalienable possessions, whether material wnnette, landed property, ancestral myths, or sacred inaliwnable, bestow social identity and rank as well.
University Press Scholarship Online.
Its history is authenticated by fictive or true genealogies, origin myths, sacred ancestors, and gods. Print Save Cite Email Share. She points to the inalienable possessions of the Australian aborigines, however, to demonstrate how the creation of hierarchy can be defeated. Reviews “Weiner provides not only a new perspective on social and natural reproduction but also a framework through which to compare societies.